Skip to main content

Robert Young v American Airlines

This December 31, 2013 1DCA opinion reversed Judge Rosen's JCC decision. This case had been before the 1DCA in 2012. In the 2012 case, the 1DCA reserved the JCC decision because the JCC erred in admitting and relying upon an unauthenticated report from the Employer/Carrier’s independent medical examiner.
The 1DCA remanded the case back to the JCC with instructions to enter a final order awarding PTD benefits based on the uncontroverted opinions of the claimant's IME unless the JCC found the opinion unpersuasive. 
On remand, the JCC rejected The claimant IME's opinions because he “was not persuaded”.  The JCC provided no additional factual or legal reasons for the rejection of the uncontested expert opinions regarding Claimant’s status as having reached maximum medical improvement and his permanent work restrictions.  
In this appeal, Claimant argues the JCC erred by rejecting the claimant IME's uncontroverted medical opinions because no legally valid basis for such rejection was provided by the JCC. 

 The 1DCA concluded that the JCC erred by failing to provide a valid reason for rejecting the unrefuted medical opinions based on findings such as flawed medical history, inherent illogic or incredibility, or any other reasonable basis for finding The claimant IME's opinions unreliable or unworthy of belief.  

 Click here to see the JCC Opinion 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

De la Cruz v Able Body Temporary Staffing

This March 6, 2012 1DCA opinion affirmed in part and reversed in part the JCC decision of Judge Sojourner. In this case, the claimant filed several petitions for benefits after injuring his right knee and left wrist in a workplace fall.  Among other things, Claimant sought authorization for a total knee replacement and TPD benefits related to the wrist injury that the Employer/Carrier had accepted as compensable.  The 1DCA held that the  JCC correctly held that the workplace accident was not the major contributing cause of Claimant’s need for knee surgery, and therefore, denied all related claims. The 1DCA affirmed that portion of the order. However, the 1DCA opined that the JCC did not rule on the TPD claim for the claimant's compensable wrist injury.  The 1DCA held that "Failure to rule on a fully tried issue is reversible error". To support their position, the 1 DCA cited the 1997 Betancourt v. Sears Roebuck & Co. Case.  The 1DCA...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is coronavirus compensable under WC?

According to the NCCI, The answer to that question is maybe. While WC laws provide compensation for “occupational diseases” that arise out of and in the course of employment, many state statutes exclude “ordinary diseases of life” (e.g., the common cold or flu). There are occupational groups that arguably would have a higher probability for exposure such as healthcare workers. However, even in those cases, there may be uncertainty as to whether the disease is compensable. Would time away from work during recovery be considered “temporary disability” or is it just normal “sick time”?    https://www.ncci.com/Articles/Pages/Insights-COVID19-WorkersComp.aspx
Post a Comment
Read more